home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.demon.co.uk!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!netcom.net.uk!ix.netcom.com!ixnews1.ix.netcom.com!decwrl!enews.sgi.com!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!col.hp.com!fc.hp.com!news
- From: Jim Rogers <jfr@fc.hp.com>
- Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic,alt.alien.visitors,alt.conspiracy.area51
- Subject: Brian *demands* that others defer to Carlotto's authority
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 1996 12:52:16 -0600
- Organization: Archaeological (lower strata contain older files)
- Lines: 41
- Message-ID: <31D03560.12E3@fc.hp.com>
- References: <31BEEFFD.288D@fc.hp.com> <DsxI83.Bsn@aston.ac.uk> <maury-1906961727220001@news.iol.ie> <31C83831.6B64@cydonia.org> <31C882BA.5968@fc.hp.com> <31C8C901.1521@cydonia.org> <31CB0F27.5B82@fc.hp.com> <31CB3CB8.2EC5@cydonia.org> <maury-2406961207460001@news.iol.ie> <31CEEA39.1F1E@students.wisc.edu> <maury-2506961036200001@194.125.2.242> <31D0023D.6994@students.wisc.edu> <maury-2506961625430001@194.125.2.242> <31D02486.4BDF@students.wisc.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hpesjfr.fc.hp.com
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (X11; I; HP-UX A.09.03 9000/735)
- Xref: news.demon.co.uk alt.conspiracy:122456 alt.alien.research:26791 alt.paranet.ufo:54520 sci.skeptic:74330 alt.alien.visitors:89641 alt.conspiracy.area51:11600
-
- Brian Zeiler wrote:
- > Maury Markowitz wrote:
- > > In article <31D0023D.6994@students.wisc.edu>, Brian Zeiler
- > > <bdzeiler@students.wisc.edu> wrote:
- > >
- > > > Maury -- you had treated the subject with ridicule and derision
- > >
- > > And you have treated me with ridicule and derision, while continuing to
- > > attempt to justify these statements.
- >
- > Yes, and you are deserving of ridicule and derision for ridiculing the
- > Face on Mars without reading the peer-reviewed works of Carlotto that
- > were published in the Journal of Applied Optics.
-
- Yes, the study that showed "teeth" at the noise level of the processing.
-
- > This cavalier attitude
- > of yours is reprehensible.
-
- I'm sure he's properly chagrined at your scolding.
-
- > FYI, I really have no opinion on the Face.
-
- I find that hard to believe, but I'll accept it for the moment.
-
- > Some evidence is compelling and it merits further study, but it still
- > wouldn't surprise me if it was a natural structure. I couldn't make a
- > bet either way.
-
- It wouldn't surprise you? Hell, it would surprise me if it *wasn't*. Maybe
- I can make the "bet" a little easier for you: I'll give you 100:1 odds that
- it's a natural formation; you pick the denomination.
-
- .....
- > > So what? Does this mean my claims are any less valid?
- >
- > Yes, it does! Sheesh!
-
- No, it doesn't, Brian. His contribution has been completely valid.
-
- Jim
-